A mysterious 'Doe 183' is trying to keep Jeffrey Epstein documents under seal. Could it be Les Wexner?

At a November 18 court conference, US District Judge Loretta Preska announced she would unseal the identities of eight "Does" trying to stay anonymous in a long-running lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell, the pal of Jeffrey Epstein who's been convicted of sex trafficking, and Virginia Giuffre, their most prominent accuser.

The exception, Preska said, was "Doe 183," whom she identified as someone with ties to Epstein and whose name appeared repeatedly in Maxwell's criminal trial.

"That Doe's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has been a subject of intense media coverage, and Doe 183's name has appeared in numerous places in unsealed portions of Ms. Maxwell's criminal trial transcript," Preska said. "In the court's view, there's no reason to redact Doe 183 from the documents."

But, Preska noted, Doe 183 wanted to appeal her ruling. So, she said, their name would remain secret for now.

Hush Hush:

The lengths that Doe 183 has gone to in order to hide their identity are unusual. They have been fighting for months — perhaps years — to keep their name out of public court documents.

Every court filing they've submitted in the case has been under seal. Nothing from them appears on the public court docket. Even lawyers for Julie K. Brown, the Miami Herald reporter who intervened in the case to bring documents about Epstein to light, have not been permitted to see them.

What we do know, however, is that every document they object to unsealing seems to be related to one of Epstein's longtime friends and benefactors: Leslie Wexner.

We also know that Doe 183 and Wexner have the same lawyer. And when Insider asked that lawyer about his work for Doe 183, a representative for Wexner responded, declining to comment.

The documents feature deposition testimony from Maxwell, discussions of whether Maxwell and Epstein gave "massages" to girls on Wexner's properties, and more accusations of wrongdoing against Epstein and Maxwell.

There are also swaths of blacked-out pages and paragraphs that we can't understand without the proper context.

The public docket doesn't show any appeals filed yet. But if Doe 183 wins their fight to keep the documents redacted, their name and the context surrounding it would remain behind those blacked-out lines.

Leslie Wexner made Jeffrey Epstein rich

Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands — which once controlled Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, and Pink — was Epstein's main patron for more than a decade.

Before his arrest on sex-trafficking charges and his eventual death in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial, Epstein claimed to be a financial savant who advised only billionaires how to invest their wealth.

His only known client was Wexner, who between the 1980s and 2000s gave him millions of dollars, put him on the board of his personal foundation, and gave him power of attorney. It was Wexner's money that allowed Epstein to live his jet-setting lifestyle — literally, on a private plane Wexner sold him. Epstein flew girls to his Palm Beach mansion, his New Mexico ranch, his compound in the Virgin Islands, and the eight-story Upper East Side Manhattan mansion that Wexner also sold him, and raped them. Upon his death, Epstein's estate was valued at $630 million, of which $125 million went to a compensation fund for 136 victims.

Epstein even posed as a recruiter for Victoria's Secret to get close to girls in order to eventually abuse them, several women said in lawsuits. Carolyn Andriano, who testified in Maxwell's 2021 sex-trafficking trial, described getting lingerie from Victoria's Secret in the mail during a period of time when Epstein serially raped her. Another accuser, who testified with the pseudonym Jane, described going shopping at one of the company's stores with Epstein and Maxwell and buying underwear.

"He said, 'Well, you know, I know everybody. I know all the agents. I know all the photographers. I know the owner of Victoria's Secret,'" Jane testified, quoting Epstein. "'So I can make things happen, but you just have to be ready for it.'"

In testimony for Maxwell's trial, Larry Visoski, one of Epstein's private jet pilots, described flying Epstein to Columbus, Ohio, where the financier maintained a home and office near Wexner. Maria Farmer, another Epstein accuser, said in an affidavit for a separate case that Epstein and Maxwell raped her in Wexner's compound in New Albany, on the outskirts of Columbus.

"I believe they were friends," Visoski said of Epstein and Wexner.

After Epstein's 2019 indictment in New York, Wexner said in a letter to his employees that he'd cut ties with Epstein 12 years earlier, when Epstein was convicted of soliciting girls for prostitution in Florida, and that he regretted ever crossing paths with him. Epstein had further "misappropriated vast sums of money from me and my family," Wexner wrote.

Now Doe 183 is trying to keep documents, including some related to Wexner's relationship with Epstein and Maxwell, out of the public eye.

A judge is methodically unsealing the names of anonymous 'Does'

Leading up to the criminal charges against Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020, their victims filed numerous lawsuits against them. The most prominent among the accusers is Virginia Giuffre, who sued Maxwell in 2015. The case produced thousands of pages of depositions, flight logs, emails, an unpublished memoir, and other evidence — almost all under seal.

After Giuffre and Maxwell settled their lawsuit, in 2017, Giuffre and her lawyers began the long process of trying to get filings from the case to the public. If you've read a story about newly unsealed Epstein files, it's probably from that case.

Other interests got involved in the case over the years, including Alan Dershowitz, a former friend of Epstein's who faced his own accusations from Giuffre in litigation that recently settled.

Preska, the judge now overseeing the case, reasoned that the litany of names Maxwell and Giuffre discussed in their original court filings had privacy rights of their own and that their names should be redacted.

Many of these "Does" have stepped into the litigation, arguing to keep their names private. Pundits have widely speculated that the Does are rich and powerful associates of Epstein who were complicit in the sex trafficking and abuse of girls.

Some have turned out to be victims of Epstein; their names remain hidden. Others, whose identities Preska made public, were people who were merely mentioned in court filings incidentally. Some occupy the gray area of having been accused of recruiting victims for Epstein but also identified as victims themselves.

A few names turned out to be Epstein's powerful friends after all. In April, Preska ruled that the names of the hedge-fund giant Glenn Dubin and his wife, Eva Andersson Dubin, should be unsealed in the filings. While he was alive, Epstein maintained a close friendship with the couple. Eva Andersson Dubin, who dated Epstein in the 1980s, testified in Maxwell's defense during her trial.

And then there's Doe 183.

The Doe 183 documents all seem related to Wexner

In a December 21 interview with Insider, Marion Little, an attorney representing Wexner, said he was unfamiliar with the fight to unseal the identity of Doe 183 in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. Little had represented Wexner in a separate case between Dershowitz and Giuffre where Dershowitz subpoenaed Wexner for testimony.

But on December 27, Insider obtained an official court transcript of the November 18 conference in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case in which Little spoke three times. While he never identified himself verbally, the transcript's cover sheet identifies him as an attorney representing Doe 183.

After Insider reached out to Little again for a follow-up interview, a representative for Wexner contacted Insider and said Little was unable to comment on the Doe 183 case because "the whole protocol process is confidential."

Little, through the representative, declined to comment on whether Doe 183 and Wexner are the same person

There are 21 docket entries that mention Doe 183's true identity. All contain redactions, some with several pages blacked out. Wexner's name and references to him can be seen in unredacted portions of many of the documents.

Of those 21 documents, there are seven docket entries where Doe 183 is the sole Doe mentioned. Those seven files have been partially unsealed, with some redactions. Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump were among the powerful men mentioned in Maxwell's trial. Looking through the Doe 183-linked filings, it's clear that Wexner is a common thread.

One docket entry where Doe 183 is the sole Doe mentioned is the deposition of Maxwell taken in July 2016. It includes a discussion of whether Epstein "shipped off" Farmer to Wexner's property in Ohio.

Another contested entry, a 23-page excerpt from that same deposition, happens to zero into the discussion about Wexner's Ohio compound.

Yet another filing where Doe 183 is the sole Doe mentioned is an argument from Giuffre's lawyer Sigrid McCawley asking the judge to force Maxwell to sit for another deposition because she didn't adequately answer several questions, including ones regarding Wexner's property.

We hear from Giuffre in another docket entry linked to Doe 183. It's a mostly unredacted transcript of a conversation from 2011 between her and two of her lawyers in other litigation, Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola. Scarola asked her if Wexner would have information about Epstein's behavior toward underage girls.

"I think he has relevant information, but I don't think he'll tell you the truth," Giuffre said of Wexner.

Doe 183 has claimed that unsealing certain documents would cause the public to assume they are guilty of wrongdoing and that they would suffer reputational damage, according to an April memo filed by McCawley, representing Giuffre in the litigation.

McCawley said the public has an interest in seeing the sealed documents.

"The public is more than capable of evaluating all the facts to which it is entitled, and making its own judgments about Doe 183's proclaimed innocence," she wrote.

JP Morgan 'pulled the levers' of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation, US Virgin Islands says in new lawsuit

A new lawsuit from the US Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George accuses JP Morgan Chase of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme and covering it up.

"Human trafficking," the lawsuit alleges, was the "principal business" of Epstein's accounts at the bank, but the bank "turned a blind eye" for more than a decade "because of the deals and clients that Epstein brought and promised to bring to the bank."

Earlier this year, the US Virgin islands settled a separate lawsuit, first brought in 2020, with Epstein's estate and its executors. The estate was required to pay $105 million, in addition to half of the proceeds from the sale of Little St. James, Epstein's island where accusers say they were raped and trafficked. 

The new lawsuit, filed on Tuesday, emerged from the same investigation and alleges JP Morgan "knowingly facilitated, sustained, and concealed the human trafficking network operated by Jeffrey Epstein" and "financially benefitted from this participation."

"JP Morgan knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully provided and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the Epstein trafficking enterprise," the lawsuit says.

One of Epstein's accounts with JP Morgan, named Southern Trust, didn't perform the "cutting edge consulting services" Epstein claimed. In reality, the lawsuit alleges, it was "a conduit for payment to foreign women, credit cards, airplanes, and other instrumentalities."

The bank and its employees knew they were facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse and sex-trafficking conspiracy to coerce "young women and underage girls to engage in commercial sex acts," according to the lawsuit.

But, according to the suit, the bank concealed its conduct by failing to comply with "red flag" laws. The section of the lawsuit that details how JP Morgan allegedly turned a blind eye to Epstein's conduct is heavily redacted.

"JP Morgan ignored numerous red flags and failed to comply with federal banking regulations until years later after JP Morgan was no longer benefiting from Epstein's business," the lawsuit says.

A representative for JP Morgan declined to comment.

The decisions to keep Epstein as a client, and to move his money around, were "advocated and approved at the senior levels of JP Morgan," including by a former chief executive of its asset management division who had an "inappropriate relationship with Epstein."

Details related to that official, Jes Staley, were redacted from the lawsuit. According to an investigation by British regulators, Staley and Epstein exchanged over 1,200 emails between 2008 and 2012. Staley stepped down from his position as CEO of Barclays in 2021 as he disputed how the regulators characterized his relationship with Epstein.

In addition to the US Virgin Islands, an anonymous "Jane Doe" filed lawsuits against JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank in November, alleging the financial institutions benefitted from Epstein's sex-trafficking operation.

Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty in December 2021 of trafficking girls for sex with Epstein and sexually abusing them herself.

At her criminal trial in Manhattan, a JP Morgan official presented documents showing that Epstein gave Maxwell at least $30.7 million between 1999 and 2007.

Another witness who testified in Maxwell's trial said that one of Epstein's jets — which prosecutors said he used to traffic women for sex — was owned by a company called Hyperion Air.

That same company, Hyperion Air, is identified by the US Virgin Islands Attorney General as one of Epstein's accounts with JP Morgan.