Revolt Against McConnell?
Sen. Murkowski blasts him for colluding with Trump on impeachment
Reacting to comments made by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), where she took a shot at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for openly colluding with the White House on President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, a CNN guest suggested she may have opened the door to more GOP senators to break ranks.
In an interview with local news station KTUU, Murkowski claimed she was “disturbed” about McConnell’s remarks about coordinating with the White House.
“To me it means that we have to take that step back from being hand in glove with the defense, and so I heard what leader McConnell had said, I happened to think that that has further confused the process,” she stated.
Speaking with host Brianna Keilar, former Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Little said things may get tough now for the McConnell behind closed doors.
“I think there are three main people in the Senate that McConnell needs to look out for,” he began. “I think Murkowski, Romney and Collins who may take that tactic and may say, ‘listen, we care about the procedure, the institutional interests of the senate.’”
“And I think one of the things of inviting in those House managers from the Republican side in Trump’s defense, if it really does become a partisan slugfest, I think they have a chance to lose more Republican senators,” he continued. “This is an interesting impeachment trial. Unlike the Clinton impeachment, the grounds for impeachment against the president are really substantial in a very different way and I think some Republican senators who deeply — if they could, there’s reports if this was done behind closed doors about the vote you’d see 30 Republicans vote to impeach the president. There are some real danger zones for the president and the Senate majority leader.”
Kentucky newspaper calls out Mitch McConnell for violating his constitutional oath of office: History ‘will be a harsh judge’ The United States Constitution is very clear about how the process of impeaching a president must be carried out: first, the president must be indicted on articles of impeachment by the House of Representatives — and after that, the U.S. Senate can hold an impeachment trial, weigh the evidence, act as an impartial jury and make a determination of guilty or not guilty. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made it painfully clear that he has no intention of being an impartial juror where President Donald Trump is concerned, and in a blistering op-ed for the Louisville Courier-Journal, law professor Kent Greenfield slams the Kentucky senator for not taking his constitutional oath seriously.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in a December 19 tweet, lamented the fact that the U.S. has a “rogue leader of the Senate” to go with a “rogue president.” Similarly, Greenfield (who now teaches law at Boston College but is a Kentucky native) asserts that both Trump and McConnell have violated their oaths to the U.S. Constitution.
Trump, Greenfield notes, will “soon be on trial in the Senate on grounds” that he “breached” an “oath” to abide by the U.S. Constitution. And McConnell, the law professor asserts, is breaching an oath to serve as an impartial juror during a Senate trial for articles of impeachment.
“In Article I,” Greenfield notes, “the Constitution gives the Senate the ‘sole’ power to ‘try all impeachments,’ and the Constitution requires that ‘when sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation.’ This special oath only kicks in when the Senate tries an impeachment, and this will be only the third time when a president has been so tried. The Framers wanted to make sure the Senate would never take such a trial lightly — this oath requirement is over and above the oath each senator has already taken to support the Constitution.”
When our Founders wrote the Constitution, they suspected we might one day have a rogue president. I doubt they thought we would have a rogue president and a rogue leader of the Senate at the same time. #DefendOurDemocracy
18K people are talking about this
Greenfield goes on to explain what McConnell will have to swear to before an impeachment trial.
“The Constitution does not set out the text of the trial oath, but the Senate rules do,” Greenfield notes. “Senators will ‘solemnly swear…. that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.’’
McConnell, Greenfield laments, has openly declared that he has no intention of being impartial during Trump’s Senate trial — even though “every senator has a constitutional obligation of impartiality.”
“The presidential oath and the senatorial oath to be taken before an impeachment trial are kin,” Greenfield observes. “The president must act faithfully and without corruption. In those presumably rare situations in which the president has failed to be faithful, the Senate is required to be faithful in its adjudication of the case against him. But we have already seen indications that McConnell has no intention of doing impartial justice. He has said that he does not consider himself an ‘impartial juror.’ He is coordinating strategy with the White House. He has already called the case against the president ‘thin’ and ‘incoherent.’”
Greenfield concludes his op-ed by stressing how seriously the U.S. Constitution takes the Senate’s role in the impeachment process — and how McConnell doesn’t take that duty seriousl
“Short of declaring war, the Senate is about to conduct its gravest and most serious constitutional obligation: to exercise the ‘sole power to try’ impeachments,” Greenfield writes. “All senators should take their obligation of faithful impartiality seriously, especially McConnell. History is watching, and it will be a harsh judge.”